Two valley oaks above vineyard rows in Sonoma County at golden hour
Our Investment Process

Great wine follows a recipe. So should your portfolio.

A disciplined, repeatable process — not predictions, headlines, or hunches — is what turns a collection of investments into a plan you can live with.

The Philosophy

Nobody makes a memorable meal by guessing. You start with the occasion, choose good ingredients, follow a method, and taste as you go.

Investing works the same way. Our process begins with your plan, not the market: what the money is for, when you'll need it, and how much fluctuation you can genuinely live with. From there we build a diversified mix of asset classes, select the investments that fill each role, and then do the unglamorous work that matters most — rebalancing, reviewing, and staying seated when the headlines get loud.

The goal isn't to win a quarter. It's to give you a portfolio that stays aligned with your life through every kind of market.

The Recipe

Five steps, repeated with discipline

1

Define the Objective

Purpose, time horizon, income needs, and tolerance for volatility. Every portfolio decision downstream traces back to this conversation.

2

Design the Allocation

We choose from across asset classes — equities, fixed income, real assets, and cash alternatives — and target a mix whose expected return and downside risk fit the objective.

3

Select the Investments

Each position is screened on both fundamental and technical criteria, then chosen for how it performs relative to its peers in that role.

4

Rebalance

Drift is a quiet risk. Returning to target trims what has run and adds to what has lagged, a structured way to be cautious when others may be euphoric.

5

Review & Adapt

We meet regularly, revisit the plan as life changes, and coordinate with your CPA and attorney so the portfolio keeps serving the plan.

Step One in Practice

Return and comfort can be a trade-off

Over long stretches, the assets that have grown the most may have also asked the most of investors along the way.

Cash can feel safe and move in a relatively straight line, but it may give up growth potential. Stocks have historically provided greater growth potential over longer periods, but they've also experienced significant declines that can lead investors to reconsider their long-term plans. Bonds may help cushion some declines, but they can lose value too.

That's why we start with your objective rather than a product. The right question isn't "what returned the most?" — it's "what mix can you actually hold through a bad year without changing course?"

Growth of $1,000,000, calendar-year total returns 1995–2025. Stocks = S&P 500 with dividends; bonds = 10-year U.S. Treasury; cash = 3-month Treasury bill. Logarithmic scale. Indexes are unmanaged, cannot be invested in directly, and returns do not reflect fees, expenses or taxes. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
Illustration of the investor emotion cycle. For illustrative purposes only; not a forecast of market behavior.
The Real Risk

One of the biggest threats to a plan can be emotional decision-making

Euphoria may tempt us to add at the top. Surrender may tempt us to sell at the bottom. Both can feel entirely rational in the moment.

A written process may be the antidote. Having guidelines for when to trim or add can help us review changes against your plan rather than react to the headlines.

Part of our job is simply to be the steady voice on the other end of the phone in the weeks when that's hard.

Step Two

Last year's leader may not be next year's

Each narrow column below is one calendar year, with seven kinds of investments stacked best at the top and worst at the bottom. The leaders change over time. Rather than guess which one will lead next, we focus on a mix that fits your plan. Owning several kinds of investments can help spread risk, but it cannot prevent losses.

Twenty years of changing leaders. Calendar-year total returns for market indexes, ranked best to worst, 2006 through 2025. Five of the seven asset classes finished first during this period. Colors match the target-mix chart below: greens are growth assets, golds are bonds, wine is real assets, taupe is commodities, stone is cash. These are index returns, not the returns of any fund, manager, or client account. Index proxies: S&P 500 (large cap), small cap index, 10-year U.S. Treasury, Baa corporate bonds, real estate, gold, and 3-month T-bills (cash). Indexes are unmanaged, cannot be invested in directly, and reflect no fees. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
The Target Mix

Every slice has a job

A portfolio isn't a list of favorites. We believe it's a set of jobs that need filling: growth, income, steadiness, inflation protection, and cash you can reach.

  • Cash and short-term bonds for near-term needs and steadiness
  • Core fixed income as the portfolio's ballast
  • Credit and international bonds for additional income sources
  • Large, mid, and small cap equities across growth and value
  • Real assets and alternatives where they fit the objective
An example mix, not a recommendation. Adapted from Stevan Dority's Investment Process presentation, “Diversified Portfolio” illustration. The weights are illustrative, not an actual client portfolio or a current recommended allocation. Holdings and weights vary with each client's objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. The 46% bonds-and-cash portion includes 43% bonds and 3% cash. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss.
Matching Mix to Mandate

Choosing where you belong on the curve

From conservative to aggressive, each mix may accept a bumpier ride in exchange for greater growth potential over time.

More risk isn't automatically better. We look for an appropriate amount of risk that gives your plan an opportunity to meet its objectives, then document why that mix was chosen so the decision can hold up when markets test it.

Illustrative portfolio mixes arranged along the risk/return trade-off, from conservative income to aggressive growth. The names shown are illustrative and available mixes vary. This is a conceptual illustration; the axes are directional and intentionally carry no figures. It is not a projection of any portfolio's results. Greater risk does not guarantee greater returns.
Hands choosing a heirloom tomato from wooden crates at a wine country farmers market at golden hour
Step Three

Shop the way you'd shop the farmers market

Nobody grabs the first tomato in the bin. You check whether it's in season, whether it looks right, who grew it, what it costs, and whether it belongs in what you're cooking.

Choosing an investment works the same way. Once we know the recipe, each spot in it gets filled by asking the same short list of questions of every candidate — what it owns, how it has behaved, who runs it, what it costs to hold, and how it fits with everything already in the basket. Nothing goes in the pot because it had a good quarter.

Five questions, asked every time. Original educational illustration created for this website, adapting the investment-selection criteria in Stevan Dority's Investment Process presentation. The farmers-market analogy explains the questions we consider, not a third-party research finding, investment rating, ranking, or recommendation of any particular investment.
Step Four

Concentration can be fragile. Diversification can provide durability.

One great idea can carry a portfolio for years and then give it all back. Owning things that don't always move together may help smooth the ride, though it cannot prevent losses. It also gives rebalancing something to work with.

Downturns bite. $1,000,000 in the S&P 500 at year-end 2007 fell to roughly $635,000 during 2008 and did not clear its starting value again until 2012. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
Diversify. The same $1,000,000 split 50/50 between stocks and 10-year Treasuries gave up only about 8% in 2008 — against 37% for stocks alone — and was back above its starting value by 2010. But the mix drifted to 35% stocks at the bottom and 53% by 2013, so the risk it carried was being set by the market, not by the plan. The dials show the stock/bond split each year. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
Rebalance. Rebalanced back to 50/50 each year-end, the same portfolio held its mix on target and finished 2007–2013 at about $1,465,000 versus roughly $1,346,000 for the version left to drift — with the intended risk kept intact rather than decided by the last good year. Rebalancing added value here because it bought stocks in 2008 and 2009, when the drifting portfolio was sitting at 35% stocks; in a steadily rising market it can just as easily cost a little. Rebalancing may have tax consequences. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
Putting It Together

The dish, not the ingredients

Diversification plus disciplined rebalancing is not a compromise between assets. It's a strategy in its own right.

In the period shown, a 70/30 blend held together and rebalanced through market cycles historically participated in much of the market's long-term growth while experiencing less downside during certain periods. Shallower declines may also help investors remain invested and focused on their long-term plan.

That's the whole point of a process: fewer decisions made in the dark, more made in advance.

A 70% stock / 30% bond blend rebalanced each year-end, 2005–2025 — a window that contains both the 2008 financial crisis and the 2022 decline in which stocks and bonds fell together. $1,000,000 grew to roughly $5.8 million, an 8.7% annualized return, against about $8.3 million for stocks alone, $1.8 million for Treasuries and $1.4 million for cash. The blend's worst year was about −20% against −37% for stocks alone. Logarithmic scale. Does not reflect advisory fees, transaction costs or taxes, which would reduce results. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Source: NYU Stern (A. Damodaran), Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills.
An old grapevine carrying ripening fruit, tended season after season
Step Five

A process is only as good as its follow-through

We review portfolios on an ongoing basis and meet with you regularly to confirm the plan still matches your life.

Allocations get rebalanced, positions get re-screened, and when something changes — a liquidity event, a retirement date, a new grandchild, a business sale — we revisit the recipe rather than improvise around it.

Talk through my portfolio

Important Disclosures

Wine Country Wealth, LLC provides all investment advisory services through Concurrent Investment Advisors, LLC (“Concurrent”), an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Wine Country Wealth, LLC and Concurrent Investment Advisors, LLC are not affiliated companies. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

Certain information presented regarding investments discussed in this communication may be sourced from third parties. While Concurrent deems such sources to be reliable, neither Concurrent nor any of its managers, officers, employees, agents, or affiliates represents that such information is accurate, current, or complete, and such information is subject to change without notice. Any opinions expressed are those of Stevan Dority and not necessarily those of Concurrent. There is no guarantee that any statements, opinions, or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

Historical-return charts on this page are built from historical market index returns and do not represent the results of any fund, manager, model, or client account. Index data shown on this page is drawn from NYU Stern professor Aswath Damodaran's Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills dataset (calendar-year total returns, updated January 2026). Stocks are represented by the S&P 500, including dividends; bonds by the 10-year U.S. Treasury; and cash by the 3-month U.S. Treasury bill. Additional asset-class proxies used in the quilt are identified in its caption. Index returns are unmanaged, do not reflect advisory fees, transaction costs, or taxes, and cannot be invested in directly. Blended and rebalanced illustrations assume annual year-end rebalancing with no fees, costs, or taxes; the portfolio-drift example is not rebalanced. No actual client account is represented.

The target allocation, risk/return curve, investor-emotion cycle, and farmers-market comparison are conceptual educational illustrations, not historical-return charts. Allocation weights and portfolio names shown are illustrative only, not current recommendations or a representation of an actual client portfolio. Illustration sources are identified in the accompanying captions where applicable.

Investing involves risk, and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy selected. Any performance information should be considered in conjunction with applicable disclosures. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Future investment performance cannot be guaranteed, and investment yields will fluctuate with market conditions. Diversification and rebalancing do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.

Portfolio-growth charts and rebalancing illustrations on this page are hypothetical, are provided for illustrative purposes only, do not reflect the deduction of advisory fees, transaction costs, or taxes, and do not represent the performance of any actual client portfolio. Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly.

Every investor's situation is unique, and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor regarding your individual situation.

A vineyard estate glowing at dusk
See It Applied to You

Let's look at your portfolio through this lens.

Bring your current statements and we'll walk through allocation, risk, and cost — no pressure, no product pitch.